Conversations Are Beneficial
Following my post titled Size Is Relative, a respected follower of mine, Joya Parsons (@Kubileya), sent me the following tweet. In it she makes some very poignant statements that everyone in agriculture, no matter the size, commodity or production practice, should take to heart.
@JeffFowle No one is throwing stones, but the instant backlash when a hashtag for small farms to connect was suggested is pretty telling as to the attitude coming from over #AgChat way.
I recall seeing several tweets a few days ago using the #smallfarm hashtag and thought to myself that it was a neat idea to provide a unique identifier for one of the groups that help make up agriculture. At the time I did not notice any “condescending” remarks being made, by either side. Later that day, however, I noticed a series of tweets with the new hashtag, promoting small farms (which is great), yet they were also speaking ill of those who were not “small.” This is what prompted me to write my original post. However, I had not noticed the reciprocal mudslinging, so I went back through the tweet stream to try to find out what Joya was describing and sure enough, there were some.
I will try to say this as clearly as possible. There are too few of us in production agriculture to begin with. The mudslinging, negative accusations and belittling one aspect of agriculture in an attempt to gain favor for another is not only childish, but ultimately, negatively impacts agriculture on the whole. We are all part of the solution and the sooner we recognize that, the sooner we can pull together for everyone’s benefit.
If you really want to tackle fragmentation in the ag community, you’re going to have to deal with decades of “get big or get out” policy, you’re going to have to take into account the countless “BigAg” practices and policies that make it harder for small farms to survive (GMO cross-pollination and rapid deregulation of GM technology, heavy subsidies for largely inedible commodities, pesticide/fungicide/herbicide drift, a gutted regional ag infrastructure from slaughter facilities to locally-owned feed & seed stores, and a million other things). You’re going to have to recognize that the ag industry is *still* in the “bigger is better” mindset (witness Monsanto’s Farm Mom contest, where a “farm” is defined as 250+acres or 1000+ cows and all other farms can go to hell).
This statement by Joya is one that has led to some very passionate discussions. On some of the issues, through conversations, we have discovered that we are in relative agreement on some of the issues and remain on different sides in relation to others. At the center of the discussion seems to be the continued belief that agriculture is still thinking “get big or get out,” and that it is the “big corporations” that are making it harder and harder for small farms, ranches and forests to survive. However, in relation to the first belief, as I addressed in my previous post, Size Is Relative, agriculture today has changed its philosophy to optimizing production with the resources available from maximizing. In regards to the second belief, I personally am feeling the pressure from government regulations, fees, taxes and public policy that is driven by urban sprawl and public perception that is based either on a romanticized vision of the farm, antiquated or falsified/misleading information from elitist activist groups; without a true understanding of where food comes from and those who grow it.
Often forgotten in the discussion is the reality that when children from farms and ranches want to return to their roots, land is too expensive for them to buy their own. Thus, they return home, families incorporate and then try to add on neighboring parcels to sustain multiple families. Care, passion, and concern for animal welfare are not lost with the increase in size. This is a very different transition in agriculture than the transition that occurred in the 80’s, involving investment bankers and absentee owners speculating on land values.
I am in agreement with Joya on the matter of direct payments. In a previous post, The Farm Bill: A Rancher’s Perspective, I stated that we need to move away from Direct Payments and towards a reformed crop insurance program, that allows all crops to be insured. To immediately stop all Direct Payments, without modifications in trade agreements and reforming the crop insurance program, could be catastrophic to domestic food production, in my humble opinion.
I have always had the feeling that the AgChat crew pushes this idea that ‘we’re all in this together’ as an attempt to silence those of us trying to make a living AND change the world through small farms. As a small farm, you never get more than a patronizing pat on the head and an attitude of, “You go play with your niche market and let the big boys ‘feed the world’ when, in fact, most small farmers see feeding the world- starting with their own neighbors and community- as the ultimate goal. I can tell you firsthand as a smallholder, that I *often* feel under attack from the same exact ultra-powerful industry that you and others think I need to join together with. So, yeah, that’s not gonna happen. Sorry for the Twitter-book. I had a lot to say 🙂
First, I can understand Joya’s perceptions, it is much the same as the feelings many in the #agchat community have, myself included, from a few of the #profood crew. However, I think we all realize that those who ridicule from both sides are few in number. It is because these jabs are being thrown that make it just as important for those in the communities to engage each other in a positive and professional manner as it is between producers and consumers.
Second, I believe it is in every producers interest to nourish and support their local communities in whatever manner is possible, first and foremost. Communities and rural towns are, after all, often considered to be extended family of the agricultural community. Means of support vary from providing food and fiber to volunteering as firefighters, youth coaches and community leaders. I am sorry that Joya feels like she is “under attack” from “ultra-powerful industry,” these “attacks,” from both sides, do not serve to advance the discussion and only fragment. I do not think that “joining” all together is nearly as important as it is to be able to communicate effectively with one another and find those issues that we can work together on for the benefit of all. All sides must move beyond the “us vs. them” attitude.
Finally, I thank you Joya, for openly sharing your thoughts and feelings on my last post and I look forward to our future conversations. These are the steps that set the example for others to follow as we all work to address the needs of people when it comes to food, fiber, fuel and shelter.
Guidelines For Comments
- @ShepNewsTeam Hey Shep, there's another 6 hrs of CA north of SFO...that's not the northern border...we're flooding too. #FYI 1 month ago
- @JonesOrganics Appears to be an average one, like I remember as a kid... 2'+ at ranch, 10'-18' on surrounding summits. 1 month ago
- My pleasure! Always look forward to conversation. RT @JeffreyJKingman: @JeffFowle Thanks man 1 month ago
- RT @JeffreyJKingman: @JeffFowle Thanks man 1 month ago
- I earnestly pray for the day that we as a society become color blind and only see people as Americans. #endthedivision 2 months ago